Spatiotemporal Modeling and Environmental Prediction in Earth System Observation: A Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71465/jgs43Keywords:
Earth System Observation, Spatiotemporal Modeling, Environmental Prediction, Deep Learning, Remote SensingAbstract
The continuous monitoring and precise prediction of Earth system dynamics are fundamental to understanding global environmental changes, managing natural resources, and mitigating the impacts of climate change and natural disasters. Over the past few decades, the proliferation of remote sensing technologies, terrestrial sensor networks, and advanced satellite constellations has led to an exponential increase in Earth observation data. This data is inherently characterized by complex spatial dependencies and temporal dynamics, necessitating the development of robust spatiotemporal modeling frameworks. This comprehensive review paper synthesizes the current state of spatiotemporal modeling and environmental prediction within the domain of Earth system observation. We systematically trace the evolution of modeling paradigms from traditional geostatistical approaches and classical time-series analysis to contemporary deep learning architectures and hybrid physics-informed neural networks. By examining critical preprocessing methodologies, data assimilation techniques, and predictive architectures, this paper highlights how modern computational frameworks handle the high dimensionality, nonlinearity, and multi-scale nature of environmental data. Furthermore, we evaluate the empirical performance of these models across diverse applications, including climate modeling, extreme weather forecasting, ecological monitoring, and urban air quality assessment. The review concludes by identifying persistent challenges, such as model interpretability, computational demands, and data sparsity in remote regions, while charting future directions toward the development of highly accurate, real-time digital twins of the Earth system.
References
Wan, Y., Zhang, K., Xia, R., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Genovese, P. V. (2026). Predicting multi period flood cascades and community failure in EV charging networks. npj Natural Hazards, 3(1), 2.
Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24–31.
Yang, K., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, X., & Du, W. (2025). SoilX: Calibration-Free Comprehensive Soil Sensing Through Contrastive Cross-Component Learning. arXiv preprint
Justice, C. O., Townshend, J. R. G., Vermote, E. F., Masuoka, E., Wolfe, R. E., Saleous, N., Roy, D. P., & Morisette, J. T. (2002). An overview of MODIS land data processing and product status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1–2), 3–15.
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., et al. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853.
Lin, Y., Xue, B., Zhang, M., Schofield, S., & Green, R. (2025, November). Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning for Tree Branch Segmentation in Autonomous Forestry Systems. In 2025 40th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., et al. (2007). The shuttle radar topography mission. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2), RG2004.
Zou, F., Hao, H., Yang, M., Tan, C., Chen, L., Wu, J., & Wang, H. (2025). Enhancing cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase-mediated potato starch modification via plasma-activated water and twin-screw extrusion treatment. Food Chemistry, 491, 145247.
HAN, Z., ZHANG, L., ZHANG, B., ZOU, F., & SHANG, N. (2024). Progress on research and application of new non-destructive testing techniques in tomato quality inspection. Food Science, 45(1), 289-300.
Song, S., Tang, Y., & Qin, R. (2025). Synthetic Data Matters: Re-training with Geo-typical Synthetic Labels for Building Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
Tang, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, J. K., & Qin, R. (2025). Weakly supervised land-cover classification of high-resolution images with low-resolution labels through optimized label refinement. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 46(5), 1913-1937.
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1–2), 195–213.
Drusch, M., Del Bello, U., Carlier, S., Colin, O., Fernandez, V., Gascon, F., et al. (2012). Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 25–36.
Lin, Y., Xue, B., Zhang, M., Schofield, S., & Green, R. (2025, November). YOLO and SGBM Integration for Autonomous Tree Branch Detection and Depth Estimation in Radiata Pine Pruning Applications. In 2025 40th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Lijun, X., Yehui, Z., Yue, S., Fanglei, Z., Honghua, J., & Guangming, W. (2022). Research on the current situation of continuously variable transmission and electric drive technology. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 43(7), 81.
Zhang, C., & Zhao, Y. (2017). High precision deep sea geomagnetic data sampling and recovery with three-dimensional compressive sensing. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 100(9), 1760-1762.
Lin, Y., Xue, B., Zhang, M., Schofield, S., & Green, R. (2024, December). Deep Learning-Based Depth Map Generation and YOLO-Integrated Distance Estimation for Radiata Pine Branch Detection Using Drone Stereo Vision. In 2024 39th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Ahmad, N. R. (2025). Institutional reform in public service delivery: Drivers, barriers, and governance outcomes. Journal of Public Service Reform, 8(1), 12-35. https://doi.org/10.52152/jhs8rn12
Ahmad, N. R. (2025). Urban water service delivery in emerging economies: Fiscal sustainability, cost recovery, and governance performance. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 10(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2025-103005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sofia Iversen, Jonathan Matthews, Sofia Delgado, Robert Fitzgerald (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Geospace Science (JOGSS) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided proper attribution is given to the original author(s) and source.